Comparison of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus by serological and RNA hybridization methods
- PMID: 58963
- DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-31-2-231
Comparison of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus by serological and RNA hybridization methods
Abstract
The relatedness of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) and Coxsackie B5 virus has been studied by virus neutralization and immunodiffusion tests and by hybridization of the virus RNAs. Clearly defined differences between the two viruses were found by the three methods. Isolates of SVDV from several countries were very closely related but could be differentiated. Recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus also appeared to be similar but clear differences could be detected between these and the prototype (Faulkner) strain of the virus. The SVDV isolates were more closely related to the Faulkner strain than to the recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus. Perhaps of more importance, the Faulkner strain was more closely related to SVDV than it was to the recent Coxsackie B5 isolates. The significance of these observations in relation to the recent emergence of swine vesicular disease is discussed.
Similar articles
-
A comparative electrophoretic examination of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus.Arch Virol. 1977;53(3):235-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01314667. Arch Virol. 1977. PMID: 193464
-
Differential diagnosis and genetic analysis of the antigenically related swine vesicular disease virus and coxsackie viruses.J Virol Methods. 1995 Jun;53(2-3):189-99. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(95)00014-l. J Virol Methods. 1995. PMID: 7673387
-
Characterization of three antigenic particles of swine vesicular disease virus.J Gen Virol. 1977 Mar;34(3):431-45. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-431. J Gen Virol. 1977. PMID: 67181
-
Coxsackievirus B5 and the relationship to swine vesicular disease virus.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1997;223:153-67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60687-8_7. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1997. PMID: 9294928 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Swine Vesicular Disease. A Review (author's transl)].Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1975 May 15;100(10):555-61. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1975. PMID: 807989 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Comparison of capsid polypeptides of group B coxsackie-viruses and polypeptide synthesis in infected cells.Arch Virol. 1981;70(3):255-69. doi: 10.1007/BF01315132. Arch Virol. 1981. PMID: 6275818
-
Classification of porcine enteroviruses by antigenic analysis and cytopathic effects in tissue culture: description of 3 new serotypes.Arch Virol. 1979;62(3):201-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01317552. Arch Virol. 1979. PMID: 229804
-
Swine vesicular disease: pathways of infection.J Hyg (Lond). 1980 Jun;84(3):355-63. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026887. J Hyg (Lond). 1980. PMID: 7052221 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of genomic homologies in the coxsackievirus B group by use of cDNA:RNA dot-blot hybridization.J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Mar;21(3):371-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.3.371-374.1985. J Clin Microbiol. 1985. PMID: 2984245 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative electrophoretic examination of swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus.Arch Virol. 1977;53(3):235-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01314667. Arch Virol. 1977. PMID: 193464
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources