Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1966 Nov 5;95(19):947-53.

Continuous epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: review of 1000 cases

Continuous epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: review of 1000 cases

P F Kandel et al. Can Med Assoc J. .

Abstract

In six years in London, Ontario, the use of continuous lumbar epidural analgesia in deliveries increased from 5% to over 50%. Its effect was assessed in 1000 consecutive cases, all vertex presentations. In established labour, epidural analgesia was started for pain relief and was maintained with intermittent injections until delivery; in 34% the duration exceeded four hours. Labour was not retarded, but there was an inadvertent selection of patients with slow and painful progress. Forceps delivery was used in 89%, mid-forceps in 11.8% and forceps rotation in 17.7%; 2.4% required Cesarean section. Fetal condition was excellent (Apgar rating of 7 or greater in 96.7%). Postpartum complications could not be directly related to the technique. Continuous epidural analgesia gives superior relief of pain but calls for experienced anesthetists and adjustments in obstetrical management and nursing care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anesth Analg. 1966 Jan-Feb;45(1):140-7 - PubMed
    1. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1958 Oct;5(4):414-8 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1959 Mar-Apr;20(2):186-91 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1960 Nov-Dec;39:511-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Sep;82:600-11 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources