Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1966 May;49(5):1065-86.
doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.5.1065.

Geotropic response of wheat coleoptiles in absence of amyloplast starch

Geotropic response of wheat coleoptiles in absence of amyloplast starch

B G Pickard et al. J Gen Physiol. 1966 May.

Abstract

Young coleoptiles of wheat (Triticum durum var. Henry), depleted of amyloplast starch by incubation at 30 degrees C with gibberellin plus kinetin, retained their geotropic responsiveness. Depleted coleoptiles curved upward more slowly than controls, but this was commensurate with their slower growth. The ratio of curvature to growth was about 50 degrees per mm of elongation in both cases. Newly excised coleoptiles, though containing much more starch than incubated controls, curved only about 25 degrees per mm. The tissue treated in gibberellin plus kinetin appeared to contain no starch when examined (a) freshly squashed, (b) as fixed material sectioned thin and stained by the PAS procedure, and (c) as electron micrographs. Shrunken, starch-free amyloplasts could be identified in certain regions, but these did not show evidence of asymmetric distribution under the influence of gravity. The possibilities that other organelles function as statoliths are considered, and it is concluded not only that georeception is independent of starch grains, but further that it may not be due to statoliths at all in an ordinary sense.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Cell Biol. 1963 Aug;18:441-57 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1961 Nov;36(6):829-37 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1964 May;39(3):413-5 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1965 Sep;40(5):966-8 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1960 May;35(3):293-9 - PubMed