Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Dec 27;4(1):15-25.
doi: 10.1007/BF00538837.

Dynamic stiffness and crossbridge action in muscle

Dynamic stiffness and crossbridge action in muscle

P Mason. Biophys Struct Mech. .

Abstract

Small sinusoidal vibrations at 300 HZ were applied to frog sartorius muscle to measure the dynamic stiffness (Young's modulus) throughout the course of tetanus. For a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.4% the dynamic Young's modulus increased from 1.5 X 10(5) Nm-2 in the resting state to 2 X 10(7) Nm-2 in tetanus. After correction for the external connective tissue, the dynamic Young's modulus of the muscle was almost directly proportional to the tension throughout the development of tetanus. The ratio of dynamic Young's modulus to tensile stress thus remained constant (with a value at 300 Hz of approximately 100), consistently with Huxley and Simmon's identification of the crossbridges as the source of both tension and stiffness. For a single crossbridge the ratio of stiffness to tension was 8.2 X 10(7) m-1 at 300 Hz; it is deduced from literature data that the limiting value at high frequencies is about 1.6 X 10(8) m-1. This ratio is interpreted on Harrington's (1971) model to show that crossbridge action can be explained by a helix-coil transition of about 80 out of the 260 residues in each S-2 myosin strand. It is also shown that a helix-coil model can account for the observed rapid relaxation of muscle without invoking any complex behaviour of the crossbridge head.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biophys J. 1962 Jul;2(4):317-26 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533-8 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Dec;64(6):623-42 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Mar;68(3):685-9 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1975 Sep;251(1):66P-68P - PubMed