Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system
- PMID: 602916
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/68.6.769
Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system
Abstract
A newly introduced automated method for antibiotic susceptibility testing, AUTOBAC 1, has been evaluated by comparison with the disk agar diffusion method (Bauer-Kirby). A total of 2,518 strains of gram-positive (540) and gram-negative (1,978) organisms isolated from clinical specimens was examined by both methods with eight or ten antibiotics, including Tobramycin. An overall agreement of 97.4% was obtained when results were compared by individual antibiotic. However, many discrepancies were observed when individual genera or species were analyzed. Of 2,518 strains examined, 651 (26%) showed discrepancies in response to one or more antibiotics. Strains, showing discrepancies were re-examined by the broth dilution susceptibility method. The results obtained favored the disk agar diffusion method. Reproducibility experiments revealed a greater inconsistency in the AUTOBAC 1 system than in the agar diffusion test. It is concluded that although a rapid automated system for antibiotic sensitivity testing is desirable, the conventional disk agar diffusion method is easier to perform, more reliable, and a less expensive procedure for antibiotic sensitivity determination.
Similar articles
-
Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.466. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975. PMID: 1147582 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of serial plate agar dilution, Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion, and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for the determination of susceptibilities of Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ten antimicrobial agents.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):251-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90028-0. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994. PMID: 7924222
-
Laboratory evaluation of amikacin susceptibility testing by the AutoBac I system.J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Mar;9(3):397-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.3.397-398.1979. J Clin Microbiol. 1979. PMID: 457852 Free PMC article.
-
Laboratory issues in the detection and reporting of antibacterial resistance.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Dec;11(4):785-802. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70390-1. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997. PMID: 9421700 Review.
-
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by flow cytometry.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Nov;34(5):613-27. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.5.613. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994. PMID: 7706157 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical impact of rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial blood culture isolates.J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1342-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1342-1345.1989. J Clin Microbiol. 1989. PMID: 2473995 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Dec;18(6):922-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.6.922. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980. PMID: 7235678 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):744-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.744-747.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6432832 Free PMC article.
-
Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Mar;21(3):412-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.3.412. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982. PMID: 6808909 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas hydrophila.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):612-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.4.612. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980. PMID: 6901591 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources