This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1967 Jul;74(3):342-50.

doi: 10.1037/h0024719.

What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?

R Eisenberger, M Karpman, J Trattner

PMID: 6052611
DOI: 10.1037/h0024719

What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?

R Eisenberger et al. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Jul.

. 1967 Jul;74(3):342-50.

doi: 10.1037/h0024719.

Authors

R Eisenberger, M Karpman, J Trattner

PMID: 6052611
DOI: 10.1037/h0024719

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DIFFERENCES IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND VERBALIZATION OF THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
MARTIN RB, DEAN SJ. MARTIN RB, et al. Psychol Rep. 1965 Feb;16:235-40. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.16.1.235. Psychol Rep. 1965. PMID: 14283969 No abstract available.
Training a new response using conditioned reinforcement.
Sosa R, dos Santos CV, Flores C. Sosa R, et al. Behav Processes. 2011 Jun;87(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 6. Behav Processes. 2011. PMID: 21458545
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement.
Newman FL. Newman FL. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Nov;75(3):412-7. doi: 10.1037/h0025050. J Exp Psychol. 1967. PMID: 6079859 No abstract available.
Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency.
Sidman M. Sidman M. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000. PMID: 10966100 Free PMC article.
HUMAN-EYELID CONDITIONING: THE RECENT EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE.
ROSS LE, HARTMAN TF. ROSS LE, et al. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1965 Feb;71:177-220. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1965. PMID: 14279692 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Beyond the relational principle of reinforcement.
Allison J. Allison J. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):557-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-557. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978. PMID: 16812077 Free PMC article.
Extending homeostasis to thought dynamics for a comprehensive explanation of mind-wandering.
Shinagawa K, Yamada K. Shinagawa K, et al. Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92561-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40082623 Free PMC article.
Lick-trading by rats: on the substitutability of dry, water, and saccharin tubes.
Allison J, Moore KE. Allison J, et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):195-213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-195. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985. PMID: 3998658 Free PMC article.
Response deprivation and reinforcement in applied settings: A preliminary analysis.
Konarski EA, Johnson MR, Crowell CR, Whitman TL. Konarski EA, et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):595-609. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-595. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980. PMID: 16795635 Free PMC article.
Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior.
Vaughan W Jr, Miller HL Jr. Vaughan W Jr, et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):337-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-337. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984. PMID: 6502069 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.