Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Dec:136 Suppl:S500-6.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s500.

Sequential immunization of laboratory personnel with influenza A/New Jersey/76 split- and whole-virus vaccines

Sequential immunization of laboratory personnel with influenza A/New Jersey/76 split- and whole-virus vaccines

R Edelman et al. J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec.

Abstract

One hundred thirty-three healthy, at-risk Fort Detrick laboratory workers were inoculated with 400 chick cell-agglutinating (CCA) units of influenza A/New Jersey/76 split-virus vaccine (Wyeth Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa.). Systemic and local reactions were infrequent, mild, and comparable to those of a sham-vaccinated group of volunteers. Only 28% of subjects 19-24 years old developed titers of hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody of greater than or equal to 1:20, whereas titers of 91%-100% of subjects 25-62 years old reached this level. Thirty-one vaccinated subjects with no or low titers of antibody were given a booster dose (400 CCA units) of Wyeth vaccine six weeks after the first inoculation. Only 58%-67% of these vaccinees achieved HAI titers of greater than or equal to 1:20 after the booster. Fourteen persons required a second booster dose for protection; after vaccination with 400 CCA units of whole-virus vaccine from Merck Sharp and Dohme (West Point, Pa.), 89%-100% of the 14 vaccinees finally achieved HAI titers of greater than or equal to 1:20. The split-virus vaccine was safe, but it was poorly antigenic as a primary vaccine in persons 19-24 years old and as a booster in persons of all ages who have poor antibody responses in general.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources