Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1977 Dec;7(4):199-210.
doi: 10.1007/BF02469351.

Myocardial protection during open-heart surgery: intermittent aortic crossclamping versus coronary perfusion

Comparative Study

Myocardial protection during open-heart surgery: intermittent aortic crossclamping versus coronary perfusion

T Murakami et al. Jpn J Surg. 1977 Dec.

Abstract

Twenty-seven patients undergoing open-heart surgery were divided into three groups, i.e., control, intermittent aortic crossclamping and coronary perfusion groups. Myocardial oxygen extraction, lactate extraction, arterial-coronary sinus hydrogen ion difference, potassium difference and glucose difference were determined during the operation, as well as, postoperative stroke and cardiac indices and comparisons were made. When the ascending aorta was not crossclamped, myocardial metabolism was well preserved during and after the perfusion at a flow rate of 2.0 L./min/m2. Intermittent aortic crossclamping for 15 minutes alternating with a period of perfusion for five minutes at 30 degrees C was sufficient to protect the myocardium from ischemia. Perfusion of the left coronary artery alone at a flow rate of six per cent of total body perfusion (150 to 200 ml per minute) at 30 degrees C was sufficient to protect the myocardium when the aorta was opened. Since intermittent perfusion of the left coronary artery may produce myocardial derangement, coronary perfusion should be continuous. Otherwise topical cardiac cooling or other means of myocardial protection should be used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1964 Jul;48:82-93 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1972 Feb;83(2):167-78 - PubMed
    1. Kyobu Geka. 1969 Jan;22(1):34-8 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1970 Nov;60(5):737-45 - PubMed
    1. Surg Forum. 1964;15:206-8 - PubMed

Publication types