Efficacy and safety comparison of nitrendipine and hydralazine as antihypertensive monotherapy
- PMID: 6085377
- DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198400067-00035
Efficacy and safety comparison of nitrendipine and hydralazine as antihypertensive monotherapy
Abstract
One-hundred and five patients with hypertension received nitrendipine (10-40 mg/day) or hydralazine (50-200 mg/day) in a double-blind randomized design. Nitrendipine decreased supine blood pressure 15/10 mm Hg, and hydralazine decreased it 11/11 mm Hg. Standing blood pressure was decreased 15/12 mm Hg by nitrendipine and 12/11 mm Hg by hydralazine. Supine and standing heart rate rose significantly after both drugs. Blood pressure variation through one dosing interval increased 42% when hydralazine was given but was not altered by nitrendipine. Side-effects from the two drugs were similar in patients who completed the study, but six patients discontinued participation due to side-effects of hydralazine, while only one discontinued due to nitrendipine side-effects. Ten patients required propranolol for hydralazine side-effects, and only three required it for nitrendipine side-effects. Nitrendipine and hydralazine are equally effective as antihypertensive monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension for periods up to 7 weeks, but nitrendipine appears to be better tolerated.
Similar articles
-
Effects of nitrendipine and hydralazine on plasma catecholamines in essential hypertension.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Oct;36(4):444-50. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.202. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984. PMID: 6478732 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of nitrendipine in patients with severe hypertension: a multiclinic study.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1053-9. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6085366
-
Crossover comparison of nitrendipine with propranolol in patients with essential hypertension.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1100-4. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6085375 Clinical Trial.
-
Nitrendipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist for the treatment of hypertension.DICP. 1990 Feb;24(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/106002809002400211. DICP. 1990. PMID: 2408259 Review.
-
Double-blind studies of calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in Japan.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;13 Suppl 1:S29-35. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198900131-00007. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989. PMID: 2468974 Review.
Cited by
-
Calcium channel antagonists. Part V: Second-generation agents.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Jul;2(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/BF00051234. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988. PMID: 3154705 Review.
-
Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;42(6):569-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00265917. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992. PMID: 1352496 Clinical Trial.
-
Nitrendipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of hypertension.Drugs. 1987 Feb;33(2):123-55. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733020-00003. Drugs. 1987. PMID: 3552592 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical