Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1984 Mar-Jun;13(1-2):7-13.

A comparative study of excisional surgery and cryohaemorrhoidectomy

  • PMID: 6087642
Comparative Study

A comparative study of excisional surgery and cryohaemorrhoidectomy

O O Adekunle et al. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1984 Mar-Jun.

Abstract

Fifty patients with haemorrhoids treated by cryohaemorrhoidectomy were studied prospectively and compared with seventy-seven patients treated by excisional surgery over a period of 5 years. Comparison was based on degree of haemorrhoids, post-operative pain, presence of complications such as bleeding, urinary retention, anal stenosis, length of hospitalization and recurrence of symptoms. Both groups were comparable in age but more men than women suffered from haemorrhoids. Patients whose main symptom was bleeding and with minimal prolapse benefited most from cryosurgery. The study also showed that only 14% of patients had significant pain after cryosurgery compared to all the patients who had excisional surgery. Complications such as bleeding and anal stenosis were more common in patients who had excisional surgery while those who had cryohaemorrhoidectomy were more liable to recurrence especially those with prolapse. The period of hospitalization was considerably shorter after cryohaemorrhoidectomy than after excisional surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources