Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy
- PMID: 6095609
- DOI: 10.3109/02841868409136037
Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy
Abstract
Based on simple radiobiologic models the effect of the true distribution of absorbed dose in therapy beams on the response of uniform tumor volumes are investigated. Under assumption that the dose variation in the beam is small it is shown that the response of the tumor to radiation is determined by the mean dose to the tumor volume. Quantitative expressions are also given for the loss in tumor control probability as a function of the degree of dose variations around the mean dose level. When the dose variations are large the minimum tumor dose is best related to tumor control. It is finally shown that high tumor control rates can only be achieved with a very high accuracy in dose delivery. If the normalized dose response gradient is higher than 3, as is frequently the case, the relative standard deviation of mean dose in the target volume should be less than 3 per cent to achieve an absolute standard deviation in tumor control probability of less than 10 per cent.
Similar articles
-
Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison.Acta Radiol Oncol. 1982;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/02841868209133977. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1982. PMID: 6283791
-
Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Aug 30;33(1):151-9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00113-D. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995. PMID: 7642414
-
Optimal radiation beam profiles considering uncertainties in beam patient alignment.Acta Oncol. 1993;32(3):331-42. doi: 10.3109/02841869309093605. Acta Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8323773
-
Recent advances in light ion radiation therapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Feb 1;58(2):603-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.034. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 14751534 Review.
-
Generalization of the normalized dose-response gradient to non-uniform dose delivery.Acta Oncol. 2001;40(6):718-24. doi: 10.1080/02841860152619133. Acta Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11765066 Review.
Cited by
-
TP53 and the Ultimate Biological Optimization Steps of Curative Radiation Oncology.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 27;15(17):4286. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174286. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37686565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiation dosimetry effect evaluation of a carbon fiber couch on novel uRT-linac 506c accelerator.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92836-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34188139 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X-ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep;22(9):271-279. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13384. Epub 2021 Aug 10. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 34375008 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation of dose-prescription for vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery taking body contouring method and heterogeneous material into account.Acta Oncol. 2025 Feb 26;64:319-325. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.41924. Acta Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40008908 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a novel low-radiation-absorbent lok-bar to reduce X-ray scattering and absorption in RapidArc® treatment planning and dose delivery.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 May;18(3):44-51. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12066. Epub 2017 Apr 6. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28383157 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical