A comparison of the actions of H1 and H2 antihistamines on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and cutaneous wheal response in asthmatic patients
- PMID: 6109741
- DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90057-9
A comparison of the actions of H1 and H2 antihistamines on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and cutaneous wheal response in asthmatic patients
Abstract
The effect of an H1 antihistamine, an H2 antihistamine, and the combination of the two drugs on both histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and dermal whealing was examined in five patients with mild asthma. Chlorpheniramine 8 mg, cimetidine 300 mg, the combination of both, and placebo were administered orally to each patient for a single dose and for seven consecutive doses given every 6 hr after a double-blind, randomized protocol. The airway response to inhaled histamine and the wheal size induced by the intradermal injection of histamine were determined in every patient 2 hr after the final drug dose. The results indicate that a single dose of chlorpheniramine produces a significant increase in the threshold of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction as measured by the provocative histamine dose producing 20% decrease in 1-sec forced expiratory volume (PD20-FEV1), and this effect was significantly enhanced after seven doses. Cimetidine caused a significant decrease in the threshold of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, but this was not augmented by seven doses. Only chlorpheniramine, when given for seven doses, improved the baseline FEV1 and forced expiratory flow during middle half of forced vital capacity (FEF25%-75%). Chlorpheniramine in both single and multiple doses and the combination of chlorpheniramine and cimetidine given for seven doses produced a significant inhibition of histamine-induced dermal wheals, whereas cimetidine alone had no effect. These results confirm our previous observation that both H1 and H2 receptors are present in the airways of asthmatic patients and that they mediate opposite effects. We also demonstrated a cumulative effect with the repeated administration of chlorpheniramine but not with cimetidine. Finally, the results suggest that the role of H1 and H2 receptors differs in the bronchi from that seen in the dermal vessels of asthmatic patients and are in contrast to those of normals. The H2 receptor effect on histamine-induced skin wheals appears deficient, further supporting earlier suggestions of the presence of an H2 receptor defect in asthmatic patients.
Similar articles
-
The effects of H1 and H2 antihistamines on histamine inhalation challenges in asthmatic patients.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Dec;120(6):1251-8. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.6.1251. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979. PMID: 42333 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of H1- and H2-receptor blocking agents on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in non-asthmatic subjects.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Mar;7(3):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00927.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979. PMID: 34415 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The comparative actions and adverse effect profile of single doses of H1-receptor antihistamines in the airways and skin of subjects with asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993 May;91(5):1005-14. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90213-y. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993. PMID: 8098339 Clinical Trial.
-
Histamine2-antagonists in allergic disorders.Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Jun;28(6):742-3. Ann Pharmacother. 1994. PMID: 7522657 Review. No abstract available.
-
H1 and H2 blockade: a prophylactic principle in anesthesia and surgery against histamine-release responses of any degree of severity: Part 1.N Engl Reg Allergy Proc. 1985 Winter;6(1):37-57. doi: 10.2500/108854185779048997. N Engl Reg Allergy Proc. 1985. PMID: 2442588 Review.
Cited by
-
Changes in bronchial anaphylactic reactivity induced in guinea-pigs by long-term treatment with histamine H2-agents.Br J Pharmacol. 1984 May;82(1):207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb16460.x. Br J Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6203589 Free PMC article.
-
Distinct roles of histamine H1- and H2-receptor signaling pathways in inflammation-associated colonic tumorigenesis.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019 Jan 1;316(1):G205-G216. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00212.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 21. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30462522 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of azelastine on bronchoconstriction induced by histamine and leukotriene C4 in patients with extrinsic asthma.Thorax. 1988 Apr;43(4):306-11. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.4.306. Thorax. 1988. PMID: 2900560 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Protective effect by UCB JO28 against histamine and methacholine induced bronchial hyperreactivity.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;28(5):517-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00544061. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985. PMID: 3899673 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. A review of the evidence.Drugs. 1992 Feb;43(2):154-76. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199243020-00003. Drugs. 1992. PMID: 1372215 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical