Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1980 Oct;77(10):5928-32.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5928.

Differential efficacies of human type I and type II interferons as antiviral and antiproliferative agents

Comparative Study

Differential efficacies of human type I and type II interferons as antiviral and antiproliferative agents

B Y Rubin et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct.

Abstract

Treatment of human fibroblast FS-4 cultures with human type II interferon preparations induced the synthesis of at least four proteins that were similar in size to four of the five proteins induced by type I interferons (Mr 120,000, 88,000, 67,000, and 56,000). However, the Mr 67,000 and 56,000 proteins were induced more strongly by type II than by type I interferon, and a counterpart of a Mr 80,000 protein induced by type I interferons was not noticeably induced by type II interferon preparations. We therefore compared type I and type II interferons for relative antiviral activities against different viruses (vesicular stomatitis, encephalomyocarditis, and vaccinia viruses and reovirus) and for cell growth-inhibitory activities on various cell types. The replication of vesicular stomatitis and encephalomyocarditis viruses was inhibited more strongly by type I interferon, whereas reovirus and vaccinia virus showed greater sensitivity to type II interferon preparations. This indicates that viruses may differ in their sensitivity to human type I and type II interferons and that the antiviral mechanisms induced by type I and type II interferons may have significant differences. The type I and type II interferons may have significant differences. The type I and type II interferons may also differ in their efficacies as antiproliferative agents. Type II interferon preparations at 2.5 units/ml inhibited the incorporatin of [3H]thymidine to a greater extent than did type I interferon at 400 units/ml. (For both type I and type II interferons, the unit of interferon activity was defined as the concentration that decreased the yield of vesicular stomatitis virus by 50% in FS-4 cultures.) Furthermore, whereas type II interferon preparations had a reversible cytostatic effect on normal human fibroblasts at 10 units/ml, the transformed cells tested (HeLa, osteosarcoma, U-amnion) showed extensive cell death, thus indicating that it may have a cytocidal effect on certain tumor cells. It appears that human type II interferon (or a factor present in these preparations) may be a potent antitumor agent.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4817-21 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):525-6 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1980 May;34(2):446-54 - PubMed
    1. Mol Immunol. 1980 May;17(5):625-33 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1964 Dec;24:586-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources