Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981;81(5):691-700.
doi: 10.1007/BF00329580.

DNA extraction during Giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU

DNA extraction during Giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU

L M Webber et al. Chromosoma. 1981.

Abstract

Human lymphocytes were cultured in 3H-labelled BrdU. Cells were pretreated to induce differentiation, autoradiographed and Giemsa-stained. DNA extraction was deduced if grain counts were lower in differentiated mitoses compared with untreated controls.--The differentiation method involved sequential pretreatments with short wave UV and 2 x SSc at 60 degrees C. This removed 34% of label from first division cells (with TB.TB chromosomes) but relatively more (53%) from second division (TB.BB chromosomes). In second division cells, about two thirds of label was lost from pale (BB) chromatids but only one third from dark (TB) chromatids. The UV and SSC pretreatments acted in collaboration, since neither alone reduced grain counts significantly.--On testing other methods, similar preferential DNA extraction was obtained with Perry and Wolff's FPG method, and with the hot salt pretreatment of Korenberg and Freedlender. However, good Giemsa differentiation could also be obtained using Hoechst 33258 and light pretreatments without any DNA loss. Reverse differentiation patterns (TB pale, BB dark) induced by warm acids resulted in extraction of nearly two thirds of 3H-BrdU label, but relative loss was the same from pale and dark chromatin. Direct reverse staining using alkaline Giemsa did not result in any loss of label.--Thus preferential DNA loss from pale stained chromatin underlies differentiation methods using light plus hot salt pretreatments, but it is not obligatory for good differentiation using other techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chromosoma. 1975 Dec 10;53(3):223-30 - PubMed
    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Sep;3(9):2183-91 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1974 Oct 15;89(1):137-62 - PubMed
    1. Chromosoma. 1974;48(4):355-60 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2808-12 - PubMed