DNA extraction during Giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU
- PMID: 6162624
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00329580
DNA extraction during Giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU
Abstract
Human lymphocytes were cultured in 3H-labelled BrdU. Cells were pretreated to induce differentiation, autoradiographed and Giemsa-stained. DNA extraction was deduced if grain counts were lower in differentiated mitoses compared with untreated controls.--The differentiation method involved sequential pretreatments with short wave UV and 2 x SSc at 60 degrees C. This removed 34% of label from first division cells (with TB.TB chromosomes) but relatively more (53%) from second division (TB.BB chromosomes). In second division cells, about two thirds of label was lost from pale (BB) chromatids but only one third from dark (TB) chromatids. The UV and SSC pretreatments acted in collaboration, since neither alone reduced grain counts significantly.--On testing other methods, similar preferential DNA extraction was obtained with Perry and Wolff's FPG method, and with the hot salt pretreatment of Korenberg and Freedlender. However, good Giemsa differentiation could also be obtained using Hoechst 33258 and light pretreatments without any DNA loss. Reverse differentiation patterns (TB pale, BB dark) induced by warm acids resulted in extraction of nearly two thirds of 3H-BrdU label, but relative loss was the same from pale and dark chromatin. Direct reverse staining using alkaline Giemsa did not result in any loss of label.--Thus preferential DNA loss from pale stained chromatin underlies differentiation methods using light plus hot salt pretreatments, but it is not obligatory for good differentiation using other techniques.
Similar articles
-
On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids.Chromosoma. 1982;86(3):375-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00292264. Chromosoma. 1982. PMID: 6184205
-
Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease.Exp Cell Res. 1985 Apr;157(2):307-14. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90115-6. Exp Cell Res. 1985. PMID: 2579833
-
Sister chromatid differential staining by direct staining in Na2HPO4-Giemsa solution and the mechanism involved.Chromosoma. 1979 Oct 2;75(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00330622. Chromosoma. 1979. PMID: 93041
-
Mechanisms involved in differential staining of BrdU substituted chromatids or chromosome regions.Rom J Morphol Embryol. 1995 Jan-Jun;41(1-2):43-7. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 1995. PMID: 8680024
-
Sister chromatid exchange.Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:183-201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.001151. Annu Rev Genet. 1977. PMID: 74232 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids.Chromosoma. 1982;86(3):375-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00292264. Chromosoma. 1982. PMID: 6184205
-
Sister chromatid differentiation in 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes: a study with DNA-specific ligands and monoclonal antibody to histone H2B.Chromosome Res. 1994 Nov;2(6):428-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01552865. Chromosome Res. 1994. PMID: 7530578
-
DNA denaturation for ultrastructural banding and the mechanism underlying the fluorochrome-photolysis-Giemsa technique studied with anti-5-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies.Chromosoma. 1989 Sep;98(3):174-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00329681. Chromosoma. 1989. PMID: 2582898
-
Differential inhibition of sister chromatid condensation induced by 5-azadeoxycytidine in human chromosomes.Chromosoma. 1986;94(5):389-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00328639. Chromosoma. 1986. PMID: 2435469
-
Considerations on the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromosomes.Hum Genet. 1984;67(3):264-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00291353. Hum Genet. 1984. PMID: 6469241