Influence of wet fixation, staining techniques, and storage time on bull sperm morphology

Abstract

The influence on sperm morphology of different methods for preparation of semen and of storage in a fixative solution was examined in 27 beef bulls subjected to a regular breeding health examination. Sperm head morphology under light microscopy did not differ between smears of fresh semen stained with carbol-fuchsin-eosin (Williams staining) or Nigrosin-Eosin. Nor was there any difference between samples stained immediately after collection and those stained after 1 month of storage at + 4 degrees C in buffered formal-saline solution. Formol-saline fixed spermatozoa examined in wet preparations under phase contrast microscopy had a higher prevalence of acrosome defects and cytoplasmic droplets than stained smears of fresh semen under light microscopy. One month of storage in formol-saline did not affect the prevalence of acrosome defects or cytoplasmic droplets. There was no influence of fixation method (wet or dry), staining, examination technique, or storage time on midpiece or sperm tail morphology. The affinity of spermatozoa to eosin at staining with Nigrosin-Eosin ("live and dead count") did not differ between fresh semen and spermatozoa that had been stored in formol-saline for 1 month. It is concluded that bull semen can be stored for at least 1 month at + 4 degrees C in buffered formal-saline without major changes in sperm morphology. Furthermore, examination of wet preparations of fixed spermatozoa under phase contrast microscope is likely to yield the most accurate results for morphological characteristics like acrosome morphology and cytoplasmic droplets.