Electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic mechanisms of intravenous N-acetylprocainamide in patients with ventricular dysrhythmias
- PMID: 6189384
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90245-4
Electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic mechanisms of intravenous N-acetylprocainamide in patients with ventricular dysrhythmias
Abstract
To define electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic mechanisms of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), we studied 16 patients with symptomatic ventricular dysrhythmias. Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of NAPA at 20 mg/kg over 20 minutes, achieving plasma concentrations of 24 +/- 3.2 to 35.5 +/- 4.5 micrograms/ml. NAPA did not significantly change sinus cycle length or atrioventricular (AV) conduction times (PA, AH, HV, and QRS), but it lengthened the QTc interval (p less than 0.001) during sinus rhythm. Programmed atrial stimulation revealed that NAPA had no discernible effects on AV nodal conduction; however, it exerted depressive effects on the His-Purkinje system in 9 of 16 patients. In 7 of 16 patients who manifested frequent ventricular premature beats (VPBs), NAPA abolished VPBs in only three of them; NAPA induced progressive prolongation of the premature coupling interval before complete abolition of VPBs. In 8 of 16 patients who had inducible repetitive ventricular response (RVR) because of reentry within the His-Purkinje system, NAPA narrowed or abolished the RVR zone in 3 patients and slowed the RVR rate with widening of the RVR zone in the remaining 5 patients. In 2 of 16 patients with slow ventricular tachycardia (VT), NAPA had no antiarrhythmic effects. By contrast, in the other 2 of 16 patients in whom sustained VT could be reproducibly elicited with programmed ventricular stimulation, NAPA slowed the rate of VT and suppressed VT inducibility. We conclude that electrophysiologic properties of NAPA are slightly different from those of procainamide and that NAPA is not uniformly effective for suppressing ventricular dysrhythmias, but its antiarrhythmic mechanisms are similar to those of procainamide.
Similar articles
-
Acecainide (N-acetylprocainamide). A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cardiac arrhythmias.Drugs. 1990 May;39(5):720-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039050-00007. Drugs. 1990. PMID: 1693889 Review.
-
Electrophysiologic evaluation of the antiarrhythmic effects of N-acetylprocainamide for ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol. 1985 Nov 15;56(13):877-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90774-x. Am J Cardiol. 1985. PMID: 2414983
-
Electrophysiologic effects of N-acetylprocainamide in human beings.Am J Cardiol. 1981 May;47(5):1134-40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90225-3. Am J Cardiol. 1981. PMID: 6164285
-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of N-acetyl procainamide and procainamide in humans.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989 Sep;14(3):364-73. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198909000-00003. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989. PMID: 2476614
-
Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide.Angiology. 1988 Jul;39(7 Pt 2):655-67. Angiology. 1988. PMID: 2457345 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of sotalol and procainamide in symptomatic ventricular tachycardia.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Apr;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01883859. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989. PMID: 2487531
-
Acecainide (N-acetylprocainamide). A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cardiac arrhythmias.Drugs. 1990 May;39(5):720-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039050-00007. Drugs. 1990. PMID: 1693889 Review.
-
Oral N-acetylprocainamide compared to quinidine plus digoxin in the chronic suppression of atrial flutter in humans.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Apr;3(2):191-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01883864. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989. PMID: 2484856 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous