Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Jul;33(3):657-69.
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90009-0.

The T-cell receptor mediating restrictive recognition of antigen

The T-cell receptor mediating restrictive recognition of antigen

M Cohn. Cell. 1983 Jul.

Abstract

Four facts characterize restrictive recognition of antigen. First, in large measure, allele-specific determinants on R are recognized when R is functioning either as a restricting element (RL) or as an allo-target (or even xeno-target) (RF). Second, there is a high frequency of virgin antigen-responsive t cells with alloreactivity, i.e. anti-RF. Third, there is a strict relationship between the class of effector function and the class of RL recognized (restrictive recognition of antigen, XF) but a relaxed relationship between class of effector function and class of RF recognized (alloreactivity). Fourth, the effector T cell functions anti-RL-dependently when XF is the target (restrictive recognition of antigen) and anti-RL-independently when RF is the target (alloreactivity). From these facts are derived the following conclusions. The T cell uses a dual recognitive, single receptor (Model I, Figure 1). A single germ-line VT locus specifying anti-allele-specific recognition of species R encodes both the anti-R and the anti-X combining sites. A "learning" process (occurring in the thymus) is required to establish the restriction specificity (anti-RL) as well as the effector function/class of RL relationship. The repertoire is derived by somatic mutation of all germ-line VT genes specifying anti-RF (Model IA, Table 3 and Figure 9). Given Model IA (Table 3 and Figure 9), we can account further for the existence of an extensive polymorphism of R and minimal polygeneism, for the high frequency of crossreactivity between anti-XF and RF, and for the physiology and genetics of cell-cell communication in immune responsiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources