Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1984 Jul;37(7):812-6.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.7.812.

Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation

Comparative Study

Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation

B J Thomas et al. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul.

Abstract

Commercially produced fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibodies for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis have recently become available. One is for detecting inclusions in cell culture (culture confirmation) and the other for detecting elementary bodies in smears from potentially infected sites. We have compared the two monoclonal antibodies with our routine isolation method, which utilises Giemsa staining of cycloheximide treated McCoy cell cultures. The culture confirmation system offered no advantages over Giemsa staining for the detection of inclusions in cell monolayers. By contrast, using monoclonal antibody to detect elementary bodies in smears was much quicker and simpler and slightly more sensitive than isolation of chlamydiae in cell culture. For specimens from seven babies with conjunctivitis and from 35 female contacts of men with non-gonococcal urethritis, there was complete agreement between the results of detecting inclusions in culture and those of seeking elementary bodies in smears. For samples from 100 men with non-gonococcal urethritis and from 100 men with gonorrhoea there was 99% and 94% agreement, respectively, between the results of the two tests. Other aspects and possible uses of the new detection system are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med Bull. 1983 Apr;39(2):181-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Sep;6(3):285-92 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources