Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1984 Jul-Aug;6(4):622-6.
doi: 10.1097/00005344-198407000-00011.

Comparative trial of indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension, with forearm plethysmography

Clinical Trial

Comparative trial of indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension, with forearm plethysmography

J H Kreeft et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Seventeen patients (11 males) 34-66 years in age with uncomplicated essential hypertension completed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study comparing indapamide (IND) 2.5 mg q am with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 50 mg q am. The lead-in placebo period of 2 months was followed by two active drug phases of 3 months' duration separated by a 2-month placebo-washout period. The mean standing systolic/diastolic pressures (+/- SD) during placebo were 150 +/- 18/98 +/- 6 mm Hg. The pressures were 137 +/- 16/90 +/- 7 IND and 137 +/- 17/91 +/- 7 mm Hg on HCT. Thus the drugs produced similar systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures. Orthostatic changes in mean pressure and heart rate were similar with the two drugs. Both drugs decreased serum potassium (-14.3% with IND and -13.7% with HCT), and increased serum uric acid (+26.7% with IND and +25.7% with HCT), and cholesterol (+11.7% with IND and +11.1% with HCT) equally. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and venous compliance (FVC) were measured by a plethysmographic technique in six of the patients. FBF during placebo of 3.53 +/- 0.58 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume was increased to 4.01 +/- 0.74 ml/min during IND and decreased to 3.40 +/- 1.16 ml/min on HCT, but our sample size did not permit detection of significant differences. FVC was not altered from baseline by the drugs. No side effects attributable to either of the two drugs were elicited. We conclude that IND did not differ from HCT in its effect on blood pressure, heart rate, venous compliance, or biochemistry. A possible peripheral arteriolar vasodilator effect on IND should be investigated further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources