A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care
- PMID: 6222487
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00005
A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care
Abstract
In a prospective study of 230 episodes of low-back pain presenting in primary care, the natural history of the symptom of low-back pain has been described. Clinical features predictive of outcome have been identified in order to define groups of patients who were relatively homogeneous with respect to the outcome of the episode. A Disability Questionnaire performed more satisfactorily as an outcome measure than either absence from work or a simple pain-rating scale. Guidelines for future trials of treatment of back pain in primary care are described.
Similar articles
-
A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983. PMID: 6222486 No abstract available.
-
Clinical course in patients seeking primary care for back or neck pain: a prospective 5-year follow-up of outcome and health care consumption with subgroup analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2458-65. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000143025.84471.79. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15507811 Clinical Trial.
-
The clinical course of pain and function in older adults with a new primary care visit for back pain.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Mar;63(3):524-30. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13241. Epub 2015 Mar 6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015. PMID: 25754841
-
[Questionnaires for patients with back pain. Diagnosis and outcome assessment].Orthopade. 2004 May;33(5):545-52. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0613-0. Orthopade. 2004. PMID: 15007549 Review. German.
-
Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care?Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):641-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0883-9. Epub 2005 Jun 2. Eur Spine J. 2006. PMID: 15931509 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Assessment of physical function and participation in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations.Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1836-1850. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000577. Pain. 2016. PMID: 27058676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Somatosensory abnormalities for painful and innocuous stimuli at the back and at a site distinct from the region of pain in chronic back pain patients.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058885. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23554950 Free PMC article.
-
Simplified functioning assessment for low back pain: ICF-based item response theory modelling.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Dec;59(6):731-742. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08003-6. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023. PMID: 38214044 Free PMC article.
-
Negative beliefs and psychological disturbance in spine surgery patients: a cause or consequence of a poor treatment outcome?Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2822-5. Epub 2013 May 23. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23695229 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient Priority Weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Does Not Change Results of the Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis Trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 1;42(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001647. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 27105466 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical