A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words
- PMID: 6238123
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.622
A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words
Abstract
Four experiments investigated Stroop interference using geometrically transformed words. Over experiments, reading was made increasingly difficult by manipulating orientation uncertainty and the number of noncolor words. As a consequence, time to read color words aloud increased dramatically. Yet, even when reading a color word was considerably slower than naming the color of ink in which the word was printed, Stroop interference persisted virtually unaltered. This result is incompatible with the simple horse race model widely used to explain color-word interference. When reading became extremely slow, a reversed Stroop effect--interference in reading the word due to an incongruent ink color--appeared for one transformation together with the standard Stroop interference. Whether or not the concept of automaticity is invoked, relative speed of processing the word versus the color does not provide an adequate overall explanation of the Stroop phenomenon.
Similar articles
-
Color priming affects Stroop interference.Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Apr;56(2):643-51. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.2.643. Percept Mot Skills. 1983. PMID: 6866673
-
The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1325-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193365. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16615380
-
Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.Mem Cognit. 1998 Mar;26(2):212-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03201134. Mem Cognit. 1998. PMID: 9584430
-
Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):721-733. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 27714665 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3. Psychol Bull. 1996. PMID: 8711015 Review.
Cited by
-
Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.Mem Cognit. 2010 Jun;38(4):493-501. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.493. Mem Cognit. 2010. PMID: 20516229 Clinical Trial.
-
A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty.Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):466-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194090. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007. PMID: 17874589
-
Made you look! Consciously perceived, irrelevant instructional cues can hijack the attentional network.Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 5. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 19457372 Free PMC article.
-
Speed and Lateral Inhibition of Stimulus Processing Contribute to Individual Differences in Stroop-Task Performance.Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 1;7:822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00822. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27313555 Free PMC article.
-
Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2508-21. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp036. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Cereb Cortex. 2009. PMID: 19321654 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials