Gold vs D-penicillamine double blind study and followup
- PMID: 6240537
Gold vs D-penicillamine double blind study and followup
Abstract
We undertook a controlled random double-blind comparing gold and penicillamine. Of the 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis entered into the study, 34 completed the protocol. We found no significant differences in the clinical results, laboratory variables, or toxicity. Longterm followup of 55 months revealed that a significant number of patients were no longer on either drug. The notable exceptions were those who were felt to be in remission from either drug, and remained on gold, or penicillamine. No toxicity from penicillamine involving known immunological aberration has thus far been encountered.
Similar articles
-
Hematuria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving gold and D-penicillamine.J Rheumatol. 1987 Feb;14(1):55-9. J Rheumatol. 1987. PMID: 3106632 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis: a progress report.J Rheumatol Suppl. 1982 Jul-Aug;8:197-200. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1982. PMID: 6813485 Clinical Trial.
-
Toxicity of longterm low dose D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Cooperative Systematic Studies of Rheumatic Disease Group.J Rheumatol. 1987 Feb;14(1):67-73. J Rheumatol. 1987. PMID: 2952797 Clinical Trial.
-
[Auranofin and aurothiomalate sodium: a comparative review (and II) Efficacy, tolerance and safety].Med Clin (Barc). 1985 Jun 8;85(2):73-9. Med Clin (Barc). 1985. PMID: 3160899 Review. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
Is the mechanism of action during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with penicillamine and gold thiomalate the same?Proc R Soc Med. 1977;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):136-9. doi: 10.1177/00359157770700S341. Proc R Soc Med. 1977. PMID: 122761 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical