Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1981 May;32(2):427-31.
doi: 10.1128/iai.32.2.427-431.1981.

Some enzymatic characteristics of eosinophil peroxidase from patients with eosinophilia and from healthy donors

Comparative Study

Some enzymatic characteristics of eosinophil peroxidase from patients with eosinophilia and from healthy donors

A J Bos et al. Infect Immun. 1981 May.

Abstract

Some enzymatic characteristics of human eosinophil peroxidase were compared with those of human myeloperoxidase. Both enzymes catalyzed the oxidation of iodide by hydrogen peroxide. This assay proved to be very sensitive; the activity of 100 eosinophils/ml could be measured. The position of the pH optimum of this reaction was linearly dependent on the logarithm of the iodide/H2O2 ratio. At the same substrate ratio, this optimum was about 1 pH unit higher for eosinophil peroxidase than for myeloperoxidase. This difference may be related to the action of myeloperoxidase inside an acidified phagolysosome as opposed to the extracellular action of eosinophil peroxidase on the surface of certain parasites. Under defined conditions (KI, 1.4 mM; H2O2, 0.18 mM; cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 0.008% [wt/vol]; pH 6), the activity of eosinophil peroxidase could be measured in a mixed granulocyte suspension independently of myeloperoxidase. Eosinophils from patients with eosinophilia were found to contain as much peroxidase activity as did eosinophils from healthy donors. No enzymatic differences in eosinophil peroxidase were found between the two types of donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Feb 1;156(1):168-78 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1969 Aug;48(8):1478-88 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1970 Jan 29;282(5):250-3 - PubMed
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1972 Feb;148(2):452-65 - PubMed
    1. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1972 Aug;12(2):170-96 - PubMed

Publication types