Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Nov;74(3):627-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb10473.x.

In vivo receptor binding of the opiate partial agonist, buprenorphine, correlated with its agonistic and antagonistic actions

In vivo receptor binding of the opiate partial agonist, buprenorphine, correlated with its agonistic and antagonistic actions

J E Dum et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1981 Nov.

Abstract

1 In order to gain more insight into the mechanisms behind the actions of opiate partial agonists, an analysis of the dual agonist/antagonist properties of the partial agonist, buprenorphine, was made in conjunction with in vivo binding studies on the drug in the rat. 2 Buprenorphine revealed a bell-shaped dose-response curve for antinociception peaking at approx. 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously. It antagonized morphine antinociception at doses which normally have agonistic effects and produced maximum antagonistic effects at doses above those having prominent agonistic activity. The withdrawal precipitating potency of buprenorphine as measured in highly morphine-dependent rats was present at doses above those having agonistic activity. The entire dose-response curve for buprenorphine was shifted symmetrically to the right by the opiate antagonist, naltrexone. 3 The dose-dependent occupation of receptors in vivo by buprenorphine seemed to be almost complete over the agonist dosage range; almost no further receptor occupation over the antagonist range was seen. 4 The possibility is discussed that site-to-site receptor interactions leading to cooperativity of effect may be the best explanation of these results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fed Proc. 1978 Feb;37(2):158-61 - PubMed
    1. Mol Pharmacol. 1979 Jan;15(1):60-70 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1077-9 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Jan;14(1):75-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Pharmacol. 1977 Aug;60(4):547-54 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources