Comparison of three electron microscopy techniques for the detection of human rotaviruses
- PMID: 6273695
- PMCID: PMC7168361
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1981.tb00108.x
Comparison of three electron microscopy techniques for the detection of human rotaviruses
Abstract
Rotavirus detection by direct electron microscopy was compared with direct and indirect immune electron microscopy techniques. The latter two approaches permitted the enumeration of 25 and 103 times more rotaviruses respectively, than direct electron microscopy. Also, 70% and 90% of the virus particles were aggregated by direct and indirect immune electron microscopy techniques respectively, thus facilitating their detection.
References
-
- Almeida, J. D. , Skelly, J. , Howard, C. R. , and Zuckerman, A. J. 1981. The use of markers in immune electron microscopy. J. Virol. Methods 2: 169–174. - PubMed
-
- Anderson, N. , and Doane, F. W. 1973. Specific identification of enteroviruses by immuno‐electron microscopy using a serum‐in‐agar diffusion method. Can. J. Microbiol. 19: 585–589. - PubMed
-
- Banatvala, J. E. , Chrystie, I. L. , and Totterdell, B. M. 1978. Rotaviral infections in human neonates. Javma 173: 527–530. - PubMed
-
- Berthiaume, L. , Alain, R. , McLaughlin, B. , Payment, P. , and Trépanier, P. 1981. Rapid detection of human viruses in faeces by a simple and routine immune electron microscopy technique. J. Gen. Virol. 55: 223–227. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
