Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids
- PMID: 6287568
Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids
Abstract
The advantages which a two-ear system has over a one-ear system appear to be manifold, but not all understood in detail. All probably play some role in the generally recognised advantage of binaural aids in offsetting auditory disabilities. Several possible forms of binaural summation are distinguished here and their possible role discussed. Experimental results with normally-hearing listeners and with aid users show that binaural summation is likely to lead to gain settings of about 6 dB lower than with otherwise equivalent monaural amplification. In some cases this may be a direct cause of benefit. However individuals differ systematically in the extent to which they show this effect, which may be relevant to prognosis for binaural aiding. Evidence is reported of an association between binaural summation and binaural advantage. Individuals also differ systematically in binaural summation for uncomfortable loudness level.
Similar articles
-
Some implications of audiological measures in the population for binaural aiding strategies.Scand Audiol Suppl. 1982;15:167-79. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1982. PMID: 6955924
-
The problem of front-back localization in binaural hearing.Scand Audiol Suppl. 1982;15:135-45. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1982. PMID: 6955921
-
Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):234-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181976993. Ear Hear. 2009. PMID: 19194294
-
Bilateral amplification for the elderly: are two aids better than one?Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 2:2S63-7. Int J Audiol. 2003. PMID: 12918631 Review.
-
Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.Ear Hear. 1996 Apr;17(2):133-61. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00007. Ear Hear. 1996. PMID: 8698160 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantification of speech-in-noise and sound localisation abilities in children with unilateral hearing loss and comparison to normal hearing peers.Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1(0 1):31-7. doi: 10.1159/000380745. Epub 2015 May 19. Audiol Neurootol. 2015. PMID: 25999162 Free PMC article.
-
Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):353-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009. PMID: 19594084 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Utility of Single-Ear and Binaural Auscultations: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88673. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88673. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40861609 Free PMC article.
-
The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.Trends Amplif. 2005;9(4):159-97. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900403. Trends Amplif. 2005. PMID: 16424945 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sound can suppress visual perception.Sci Rep. 2015 May 29;5:10483. doi: 10.1038/srep10483. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26023877 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous