Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983;398(3):263-75.
doi: 10.1007/BF00583584.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein in medulloblastomas and other embryonic CNS tumours of children

Glial fibrillary acidic protein in medulloblastomas and other embryonic CNS tumours of children

E Schindler et al. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1983.

Abstract

Investigation of GFAP in 50 medulloblastomas showed a few GFAP-positive tumour cells in 5 cases only; 17 tumours were negative, and 28 showed a "pseudopositivity", i.e. GFAP-bearing cells were identified as reactive or degenerating astrocytes, intermingled with tumour elements. A high GFAP content was seen in 2 small-cell gliomas of the cerebellum, whereas 3 pineoblastomas, 2 neuroblastomas of CNS, and one medulloepithelioma were negative. GFAP is a very good method for identificating astrocytes, but does not seem to be reliable for identifying the origin of undifferentiated tumours such as medulloblastomas. In these neoplasms glial differentiation is lacking or extremely rare, GFAP-positivity being mostly an artifact. The investigation of small tumour samples or the positivity of a single cell are inadequate data for a correct evaluation of the findings, especially taking in mind that GFAP of degenerated astrocytes can be phagocytised by cells other than glial (e.g., macrophages, epithelial and meningioma cells). The importance of carefully checking the whole structure of the tumour is stressed, GFAP positivity or negativity being not a sufficient criterion for its nosological classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pathologica. 1980 Jan-Feb;72(1017):27-34 - PubMed
    1. Ann Neurol. 1982 Feb;11(2):203-6 - PubMed
    1. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1978 May-Jun;4(3):177-90 - PubMed
    1. Acta Neuropathol. 1978 Jun 30;42(3):183-90 - PubMed
    1. Hum Pathol. 1982 May;13(5):454-8 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources