Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Aug:341:59-74.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014792.

The strength-duration relationship for excitation of myelinated nerve: computed dependence on membrane parameters

The strength-duration relationship for excitation of myelinated nerve: computed dependence on membrane parameters

H Bostock. J Physiol. 1983 Aug.

Abstract

Thresholds to applied current pulses have been determined for the myelinated nerve model of Goldman & Albus (1968). Strength-duration curves have been plotted, and compared with three strength-duration equations that have been proposed in the past. The simple, linear relation between stimulus charge and stimulus duration proposed by Weiss (1901) provided the best fit to the computed data. The effects on the strength-duration relationship of changes in twelve parameters of the model were determined and expressed in terms of the strength-duration time constant and rheobasic current. The rheobase depended primarily on conductances, whereas the strength-duration time constant depended on the electrotonic time constant and also on the rate of sodium activation. The model predicts strength-duration curves of the same form, for extracellular or intracellular stimulation where the external resistance is low and uniform. Tripolar stimulation, with anodes over adjacent rather than remote nodes, is predicted to result in much shorter strength-duration time constants, but with a similar sensitivity to nodal membrane parameters. The limitations of strength-duration measurements on myelinated nerves are discussed in the light of these simulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Physiol. 1979 Jul;292:149-66 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:431-7 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1970 Jun;208(2):279-89 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(4):780-7 - PubMed
    1. Biophys J. 1968 May;8(5):596-607 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources