Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
- PMID: 6327296
- PMCID: PMC7088116
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02014331
Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
Abstract
The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost ) and a latex agglutination test ( Rotalex ). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex , 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost , 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex .
References
-
- Wyatt R. G., James W. D., Bohl E. H., Theil K. W., Saif L. J., Kalica A. R., Greenberg H. B., Kapikian A. Z., Chanock R. M. Human rotavirus type 2: cultivation in vitro. Science. 1980;207:189–191. - PubMed
-
- Flewett T. H., Bryden A. S., Davies H. A. Virus particles in gastroenteritis. Lancet. 1973;ii:1974. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical