Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984;18(2):69-74.
doi: 10.1007/BF00205736.

The therapeutic significance of concomitant antitumor immunity. I. LY-1-2+ T cells from mice with a progressive tumor can cause regression of an established tumor in gamma-irradiated recipients

The therapeutic significance of concomitant antitumor immunity. I. LY-1-2+ T cells from mice with a progressive tumor can cause regression of an established tumor in gamma-irradiated recipients

R J North. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1984.

Abstract

It is shown that progressive growth of the SA1 sarcoma in its semisyngeneic AB6F1 host results in the generation of concomitant immunity to growth of a tumor challenge implant, and in the generation of T cells in the spleen capable, on passive transfer, of causing regression of an established tumor in gamma-irradiated recipients, but not in normal recipients. T cells that passively transferred concomitant immunity against an established tumor were first generated around day 6 of tumor growth, reached peak numbers on day 9, and slowly decreased in number thereafter. They were of the Ly-1-2+ phenotype, in that they were functionally eliminated by treatment with monoclonal anti-Ly-2 antibody and complement, but not by treatment with anti-Ly-1 antibody and complement. The paradoxical ability of T cells from a donor with a relatively large tumor to cause the regression of a tumor in sublethally gamma-irradiated recipients is explained with reference to the facts that the recipient tumor was only half as large as the donor tumor at the time of passive transfer, and that the recipient was incapable of generating suppressor T cells that would function to inhibit the expression of adoptive immunity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Burton RC, Warner NL. In vitro induction of tumor-specific immunity. IV. Specific adoptive immunotherapy with cytotoxic T cells induced in vitro to plasmacytoma antigens. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1977;2:91.
    1. Dye ES, North RJ (1984) Adoptive immunization against an established tumor with cytolytic versus memory T cells: Immediate versus delayed onset of regression. Transplantation (in press) - PubMed
    1. Eberlin TJ, Rosenstein M, Rosenberg SA. Regression of a disseminated syngeneic solid tumor by systemic transfer of lymphoid cells expanded in interleukin 2. J Exp Med. 1982;156:385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engers HD, Sorenson GD, Terres G, Horvath C, Brunner KT. Functional activity in vivo of effector T cell populations. I. Antitumor activity exhibited by allogeneic mixed leukocyte culture cells. J Immunol. 1982;129:1292. - PubMed
    1. Gorelik E. Concomitant tumor immunity and resistance to a second tumor challenge. Adv Cancer Res. 1983;39:71. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources