Preservation of canine segmental pancreatic autografts: cold storage versus pulsatile machine perfusion
- PMID: 6341715
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(83)90101-4
Preservation of canine segmental pancreatic autografts: cold storage versus pulsatile machine perfusion
Abstract
The reliability of cold storage and pulsatile machine perfusion for preservation of open-duct segmental pancreatic grafts for 24, 48, and 72 hours was determined in a canine autograft model. The tail (left limb) of the pancreas on a pedicle of splenic artery and vein was transplanted to the pelvis with vascular anastomoses to the iliac vessels and the remainder of the pancreas was excised. Twenty nonpreserved grafts functioned immediately (the recipients became normoglycemic, plasma glucose less than 150 mg/dl), 16 long term (80%). Collins solution (CS, osmolality 300 mosm/kg) and a silica gel filtered plasma solution (SGF-I, osmolality 430 mosm/kg) were compared for cold storage at 4 degrees C. The long-term functional survival rate for grafts stored for 24 hours in SGF-I was 9/12 (75%) and in CS was 8/12 (67%). When graft preservation time was extended to 48 hours, 9/12 (75%) stored in SGF-I and 4/10 (40%) in CS functional long term. The preservation failure rates were 0% in grafts stored in SGF for up to 48 hours, but were 20% and 50% for grafts stored in CS for 24 and 48 hours. Storage at 72 hours was not satisfactory; even when SGF-I was used, the preservation failure rate was 57%. SGF was also used as the perfusate for pancreas preservation on the Mox-100 machine at a pressure of 30 mm Hg (achieved by leaving the port opposite the connected pancreas open). Lower pressures gave insufficient perfusion and higher pressures led to severe edema of grafts. Mean (+/- S.E.) flow (ml/min) through the grafts were 4.5 +/- 0.3 initially, 6.5 +/- 0.7 at 24 hours and 6.3 +/- 0.9 at 48 hours. With SGF-I only 6/12 (50%) of grafts perfused for 24 hours and only 1/8 (12%) for 48 hours functioned long term. With a modified perfusate (SGF-II, osmolality 470-500 mosm/kg) the results were slightly improved; 7/12 (58%) grafts perfused for 24 hours and 5/10 (50%) for 48 hours functioned long term. The mean (+/- S.E.) flow rate (ml/min) was 5.0 +/- 0.6 in grafts that functioned long term and was 8.3 +/- 1.0 in those that failed due to preservation complications. Mean (+/- S.E.) peak serum amylase levels (I.U./L.) were similar in recipients of fresh grafts (3953 +/- 365) and those stored hypothermically in SGF (4226 +/- 327), but were significantly lower in recipients of machine perfused grafts (2988 +/- 228). Although the percentage of successful transplants varied according to the preservation techniques, the mean (+/- S.E.) IVGTT K-values in recipients with functioning grafts were similar between the groups (-1.44 +/- .19 to -1.82 +/- .17%). The pure pancreas preservation failure rates with machine perfusion were between 30% and 40% at 24 to 48 hours, compared to 0% in those simply stored in cold SGF for 24 to 48 hours. We conclude that pancreas preservation by cold storage in high osmolar silica gel filtered plasma is more reliable than pulsatile machine perfusion and provides sufficient time to complete the logistical maneuvers necessary for clinical pancreas transplantation from cadaver donors.
Similar articles
-
Long-term preservation of segmental pancreas autografts.Surgery. 1982 Aug;92(2):260-9. Surgery. 1982. PMID: 6285535
-
Preservation of the pancreas for transplantation.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Jan;148(1):57-61. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979. PMID: 364704
-
Experience with 3, 6, and 24 hours' hypothermic storage of the canine pancreas before islet cell preparation and transplantation.Surgery. 1987 Sep;102(3):460-4. Surgery. 1987. PMID: 3307004
-
Current state of pancreas preservation and implications for DCD pancreas transplantation.Transplantation. 2013 Jun 27;95(12):1419-24. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318285558f. Transplantation. 2013. PMID: 23579769 Review.
-
Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review.Clin Transplant. 2003 Aug;17(4):293-307. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2003.00077.x. Clin Transplant. 2003. PMID: 12868986
Cited by
-
Is 2 h of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion for Pancreas Preservation Effective in Improving Graft Reperfusion?Transplant Direct. 2025 Jul 24;11(8):e1834. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001834. eCollection 2025 Aug. Transplant Direct. 2025. PMID: 40718054 Free PMC article.
-
Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: The clinical perspective.Cryobiology. 2010 Jul;60(3 Suppl):S20-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.006. Epub 2009 Oct 24. Cryobiology. 2010. PMID: 19857479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ex situ Perfusion of Pancreas for Whole-Organ Transplantation: Is it Safe and Feasible? A Systematic Review.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):120-134. doi: 10.1177/1932296819869312. Epub 2019 Aug 13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020. PMID: 31409133 Free PMC article.
-
Machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation: where is the benefit?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1161-2. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014. PMID: 24429900 Review.
-
Organ Preservation: Current Concepts and New Strategies for the Next Decade.Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(2):125-142. doi: 10.1159/000327033. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Transfus Med Hemother. 2011. PMID: 21566713 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical