Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1983 May-Jun;15(3):119-26.

Impact of vacuum aspiration abortion on future childbearing: a review

  • PMID: 6347709
Review

Impact of vacuum aspiration abortion on future childbearing: a review

C J Hogue et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 May-Jun.

Abstract

Ever since induced abortion was legalized in the United States, there has been a running controversy over whether induced abortion affects subsequent childbearing; for example, it has been claimed that women who terminate a pregnancy are at a greater risk of miscarrying a subsequent pregnancy or of having a low-birth-weight baby. Ten studies of the later impact of first-trimester induced abortion by vacuum aspiration (the dominant method in the United States) are examined here; they find that compared with women who carry their first pregnancy to term, women whose first pregnancy ends in induced abortion have no greater risk of bearing low-birth-weight babies, delivering prematurely or suffering spontaneous abortions in subsequent pregnancies. However, these studies also show that induced abortion of a woman's first pregnancy does not have the protective effect on her first live birth that carrying a first birth to term has on later deliveries. In addition, some evidence from other studies links dilatation and curettage (D&C) procedures with later infertility, but most studies have found no such association. No definite conclusions can be reached about the impact of multiple induced abortions, since the results of 13 different epidemiologic studies are almost evenly divided between those that show no effect and those reporting related reproductive problems.

PIP: Ever since induced abortion was legalized in the U.S. there has been a running controversy over whether induced abortion affects subsequent childbearing; for example, it has been claimed that women who terminate a pregnancy are at a greater risk of miscarrying a subsequent pregnancy or of having a low birthweight baby. 10 studies of the later impact of 1st trimester induced abortion by vacuum aspiration (the dominant method in the U.S.) are examined; compared with women who carry their 1st pregnancy to term, women whose 1st pregnancy ends in induced abortion have no greater risk of bearing low birthweight babies, delivering prematurely or suffering spontaneous abortions in subsequent pregnancies. However, these studies also show that induced abortion of a woman's 1st pregnancy is without the protective effect on her 1st live birth that carrying a 1st birth to term has on later deliveries. In addition, some evidence from other studies links dilatation and curettage procedures with later infertility, but most studies have found no such association. No definite conclusions can be reached about the impact of multiple induced abortions, since the results of 13 different epidemiologic studies are almost evenly divided between those that show no effect and those reporting related reproductive problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources