Urine screening with the MS-2
- PMID: 6348075
- PMCID: PMC272802
- DOI: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1061-1065.1983
Urine screening with the MS-2
Abstract
A study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the MS-2 (Abbott Laboratories, Dallas, Tex.) in screening urine specimens in a large clinical laboratory. A total of 15,319 urine specimens (9,954 midstream specimens and 5,365 catheter specimens) were evaluated with the MS-2 and by a surface streak procedure. The study was conducted in two phases, differing in that phase II urine specimens were evaluated in the MS-2 by using a program software update (03.01). For midstream urine specimens, MS-2 detection rates in phases I and II were, respectively, 94.5 and 94.3% at a plate count of greater than 10(5) CFU/ml, 74.4 and 65.3% at plate counts of 5 X 10(4) to 1 X 10(5) CFU/ml, 55.0 and 52.4% at plate counts of 1 X 10(4) to 5 X 10(4) CFU/ml, 31.2 and 20.5% at plate counts of 10(3) to 10(4) CFU/ml, and 15.7 and 6.4% at plate counts of less than 10(3) CFU/ml. For catheter urine specimens, the MS-2 detection rates in phases I and II were, respectively, 95.4 and 96.8% at plate counts greater than 10(5) CFU/ml, 74.4 and 85.7% at plate counts of 5 X 10(4) to 1 X 10(5) CFU/ml, 50.0 and 44.4% at plate counts 10(4) to 5 X 10(4) CFU/ml, 25.6 and 14.9% at plate counts of 10(3) to 10(4) CFU/ml, and 14.7 and 5.2% at plate counts less than 10(3) CFU/ml.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the MS-2 urine screening system.J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):509-11. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.509-511.1983. J Clin Microbiol. 1983. PMID: 6355144 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the MS-2 and Lumac systems for the rapid screening of urine specimens.Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;81(5):629-33. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.5.629. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984. PMID: 6372433
-
Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems.J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):468-74. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.468-474.1982. J Clin Microbiol. 1982. PMID: 7076820 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.Food Microbiol. 2006 Feb;23(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.010. Food Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16942983 Review.
-
Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens.Am J Med. 1987 Oct;83(4):739-45. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90907-7. Am J Med. 1987. PMID: 3314496 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of two bioluminescence-measuring instruments, the Turner Design and Lumac systems, for the rapid screening of urine specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1165-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1165-1170.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6394619 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of the MS-2 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a collaborative study with blindly assigned reference stains.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1135-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1135-1139.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6394615 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Lumac and Monolight systems for detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):797-801. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.797-801.1984. J Clin Microbiol. 1984. PMID: 6490862 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical