Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1983 Nov;29(4):285-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(83)72634-9.

Efficacy of atropine as an endoscopic premedication

Clinical Trial

Efficacy of atropine as an endoscopic premedication

E L Cattau Jr et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 1983 Nov.

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of atropine as an endoscopic premedication, we prospectively evaluated in double-blind fashion 196 elective endoscopies performed on 189 consecutive consenting patients. Group 1 (95 endoscopies) received meperidine, 1.5 mg/kg, intramuscularly 30 min prior to endoscopy. Group 2 (101 endoscopies) additionally received atropine, 0.6 mg, in the same injection. Endoscopy was performed by one of two investigators using a 13-mm fiberoptic instrument. Endoscopists and patients filled out postendoscopy questionnaires. Both endoscopists (p less than 0.01) and patients (p less than 0.05) noted less oral secretions after atropine. Endoscopists noted less gastric motility after atropine (p less than 0.05) and guessed correctly whether or not atropine had been given in two thirds of cases. They noted no overall difference, however, in the ease of the endoscopy (p greater than 0.05). Moreover, there were no differences in the patients' assessments of the acceptability of the procedure between the two groups (p greater than 0.05). We concluded that although atropine does not improve patients' tolerance for the examination or the endoscopists' ability to do an adequate examination, it does objectively decrease the amount of gastric motility and oral secretions. This latter effect could potentially decrease the hazard of aspiration, but such a benefit could not be demonstrated in our series.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources