Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Dec;156(3):1093-8.
doi: 10.1128/jb.156.3.1093-1098.1983.

Mechanisms for recF-dependent and recB-dependent pathways of postreplication repair in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli uvrB

Mechanisms for recF-dependent and recB-dependent pathways of postreplication repair in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli uvrB

T C Wang et al. J Bacteriol. 1983 Dec.

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms for the recF-dependent and recB-dependent pathways of postreplication repair were studied by sedimentation analysis of DNA from UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. When the ability to repair DNA daughter strand gaps was compared, uvrB recF cells showed a gross deficiency, whereas uvrB recB cells showed only a small deficiency. Nevertheless, the uvrB recF cells were able to perform some limited repair of daughter strand gaps compared with a "repairless" uvrB recA strain. The introduction of a recB mutation into the uvrB recF strain greatly increased its UV radiation sensitivity, yet decreased only slightly its ability to repair daughter strand gaps. Kinetic studies of DNA repair with alkaline and neutral sucrose gradients indicated that the accumulation of unrepaired daughter strand gaps led to the formation of low-molecular-weight DNA duplexes (i.e., DNA double-strand breaks were formed). The uvrB recF cells were able to regenerate high-molecular-weight DNA from these low-molecular-weight DNA duplexes, whereas the uvrB recF recB and uvrB recA cells were not. A model for the recB-dependent pathway of postreplication repair is presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jan 28;31(2):291-304 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jul;151(1):186-92 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1970 Aug;51(3):459-72 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1971 Jan;105(1):127-35 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1971 Oct 14;61(1):25-44 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources