Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1984 Jan;37(1):65-9.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.1.65.

Automated detection of micro-organisms in blood cultures by means of the Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser

Comparative Study

Automated detection of micro-organisms in blood cultures by means of the Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser

D F Brown et al. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jan.

Abstract

A prototype Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser was compared with conventional methods for examining blood cultures in a trial of 651 cultures mostly from patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing haemodialysis or renal transplantation. Of 100 significantly positive cultures, organisms from 82 grew in the conventional aerobic (+ CO2) bottle, 78 in the conventional anaerobic bottle and 71 in the Malthus bottle. The differences were not statistically significant (p greater than 0.05). The Malthus system detected 83.6% of significantly positive cultures earlier than the comparable conventional bottles while 7.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the conventional system. When use of the Malthus system was restricted to the hours of 09.00 to 17.30 daily 27.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the Malthus system and 16.4% were detected earlier by the conventional system. One of the organisms which grew in the Malthus bottle, a contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis, was not detected by the Malthus system. Instability of electrodes resulted in 26.9% false positive cultures with the prototype Malthus system. Contamination rates in both the Malthus and conventional anaerobic bottles were lower than in the aerobic bottles.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Med Microbiol. 1975 Feb;8(1):19-28 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Jul;66(1):80-6 - PubMed
    1. J Phys E. 1978 Jun;11(6):560-8 - PubMed

Publication types