The clinical efficacy of localized hyperthermia
- PMID: 6380711
The clinical efficacy of localized hyperthermia
Abstract
Localized hyperthermia alone can induce regressions in human neoplasms, but superior results can be obtained by integrating hyperthermia with even low doses of radiotherapy. Several clinical trials demonstrate that hyperthermia plus irradiation can produce higher tumor response rates than the same irradiation alone. While minimal enhancement of irradiation effects on normal tissues is reported, this may be due in part to the physical localization of the heating preferentially in tumors, often assisted by normal tissue cooling or shielding. These advantages may exist only in special circumstances in the treatment of deep tumor volumes. A variety of hyperthermia and irradiation fractionation schemes has been used; the optimal one(s) is yet to be clearly established. To date, no tumor histology has been shown to be more sensitive than another, although the relative radioresistance of melanomas, especially to smaller fraction sizes, is substantially offset by the addition of hyperthermia. Larger tumor volumes are more difficult to heat and achieve lower response rates, but may be relatively less problematic for combined hyperthermia and irradiation than for irradiation alone. Currently used microwave and unfocused ultrasound applicators, when used singly, usually achieve potentially therapeutic temperatures to only about 2- to 4-cm depth, although site-specific tissue characteristics may greatly alter this in individual circumstances. Anatomical factors limit the number of sites which can be usefully treated because of inflexibilities of the currently available equipment. Single-point temperature measurements during treatment correlate poorly with tumor response, while minimum mean tumor temperatures may correlate more strongly. Local and radicular pain occurs commonly during treatment, superficial burns occur occasionally, but major tissue complications have been reported rarely. While the efficacy of localized hyperthermia in augmenting tumor responses to irradiation with acceptable toxicity is established, much important clinical work remains to be done in carefully defined treatment protocols.
Similar articles
-
Combined interstitial irradiation and localized current field hyperthermia: results and conclusions from clinical studies.Cancer Res. 1984 Oct;44(10 Suppl):4757s-4760s. Cancer Res. 1984. PMID: 6380713 Clinical Trial.
-
Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic.Int J Hyperthermia. 2009 Feb;25(1):3-20. doi: 10.1080/02656730902747919. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009. PMID: 19219695
-
Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.Oncologist. 1997;2(1):59-61. Oncologist. 1997. PMID: 10388030
-
Hyperthermia--its actual role in radiation oncology. Part III: Clinical rationale and results in deep seated tumors.Strahlenther Onkol. 1995 May;171(5):251-64. Strahlenther Onkol. 1995. PMID: 7770780 Review.
-
Clinical trials with local (external and interstitial) irradiation and hyperthermia. Current and future perspectives.Radiol Clin North Am. 1989 May;27(3):525-42. Radiol Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2648458 Review.
Cited by
-
Investigating Tumour Responses to Combinations of Radiotherapy and Hyperthermia.Bull Math Biol. 2025 Jul 1;87(8):107. doi: 10.1007/s11538-025-01449-7. Bull Math Biol. 2025. PMID: 40593385 Free PMC article.
-
Microwave plaque thermoradiotherapy for choroidal melanoma.Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Jun;76(6):358-64. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.6.358. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992. PMID: 1622949 Free PMC article.
-
Local microwave hyperthermia in treatment of advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma.Urol Res. 1988;16(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00264620. Urol Res. 1988. PMID: 3344560