Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1984;73(3):190-6.

Bupivacaine and intravenous regional anaesthesia--a matter of controversy

  • PMID: 6388484
Review

Bupivacaine and intravenous regional anaesthesia--a matter of controversy

E Kalso et al. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1984.

Abstract

The role of bupivacaine in IVRA is controversial. It produces a reliable sensory and motor block and when used in larger doses prolonged residual analgesia is also achieved. Large series of its use without toxic complications have been presented. Yet, there are sporadic reports of severe, even fatal complications, usually as the result of a technical failure. In this article bupivacaine is compared to two other local anaesthetics commonly used in IVRA, i.e. lignocaine and prilocaine. Acidosis and hyperkaliemia are likely to increase the risk of bupivacaine toxicity. Other contributing factors include leakage under the tourniquet cuff and preexisting cardiac disease. We conclude that bupivacaine is a useful agent for IVRA assuming that the patients are carefully selected and the anaesthetist is aware of the possible risks and their prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer