Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Sep;26(3):373-7.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.3.373.

Renal disposition of ceftazidime illustrated by interferences by probenecid, furosemide, and indomethacin in rabbits

Renal disposition of ceftazidime illustrated by interferences by probenecid, furosemide, and indomethacin in rabbits

C Carbon et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Sep.

Abstract

Excretion of ceftazidime (C), a new cephalosporin antibiotic, has been reported to occur unexpectedly through glomerular filtration only, without being significantly affected by probenecid. We investigated renal tubular disposition of C in rabbits by calculating its rates of fractional excretion, net tubular secretion, and absolute excretion. During continuous intravenous infusion of C, 3 mg of furosemide (F), 15 mg of probenecid (P), or 2 mg of indomethacin (I) per kg was injected intravenously as a bolus. Equilibrium dialysis showed that the percentage of C bound to serum proteins (14 +/- 5%) was not altered by F, P, or I. Fractional excretion of C was 94 +/- 22, 65 +/- 21, 182 +/- 36, and 98 +/- 3% for the drug given alone and after injection of F, P, and I, respectively. For 15 min after P injection, we observed net tubular secretion of C (404 +/- 276 micrograms/min). The C absolute excretion rate was significantly reduced by I compared with the absolute excretion rate for the control (405 +/- 104 versus 696 +/- 157 micrograms/min). We conclude that (i) C undergoes bidirectional transport in the nephron, revealed by the effects of F and P, with a nil net C balance; (ii) F and P have opposite unexpected effects on tubular handling of C, possibly due to competition for C secretion processes; (iii) I reduces C excretion solely by decreasing its glomerular-filtered load; and (iv) tubular handling of C differs from that of previously studied cephalosporins.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):170-7 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1973 Oct;1(5):435-61 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Apr;11(4):594-8 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1978 Dec;43(6):889-98 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Nov;8(5):491-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources