Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1984 Sep;26(3):388-93.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.3.388.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam and their microbiological correlates in volunteers

Comparative Study

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam and their microbiological correlates in volunteers

G L Drusano et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Sep.

Abstract

We compared ceftazidime with moxalactam, a commonly utilized, currently available drug. The microbiological activities of ceftazidime and moxalactam were studied. In addition, single-dose pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity 1 and 6 h after a 2.0-g, 30-min infusion of each drug were determined in a crossover study in human volunteers. In vitro, both drugs had MICs for 90% of the isolates of less than 1.0 microgram/ml against the common members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and of 8.0 micrograms/ml against Staphylococcus aureus. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftazidime was more active than moxalactam, the respective MICs for 90% of the isolates being 8 and 128 micrograms/ml. Mean half-lives were 1.75 (+/- 0.21) h for ceftazidime and 2.5 (+/- 0.38) h for moxalactam. The serum bactericidal titers for both compounds against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were high. Titers against S. aureus 6 h after infusion were negative. The mean (geometric) serum bactericidal titer of ceftazidime against 31 strains of P. aeruginosa (1:44) was higher than that of moxalactam (1:3.4).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):45-66 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jul;142(1):77-82 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Nov-Dec;4 Suppl:S585-94 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):488-93 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Sep;20(3):351-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources