Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1983 Apr;9(4):431-6.
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90058-5.

Split-course versus continuous pelvis irradiation in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a prospective randomized clinical trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Clinical Trial

Split-course versus continuous pelvis irradiation in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a prospective randomized clinical trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

V A Marcial et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Apr.

Abstract

In August 1980, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) completed a prospective randomized clinical trial for the comparison of a split-course versus a standard continuous course of pelvic irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix Stages II-B, III-A, III-B, and IV-A. The split-course consisted of 10 fractions of 250 rad each, 5 times a week, up to 2500 rad followed by a rest period of approximately 2 weeks and then another 2500 rad was given (250 X 10). The continuous course consisted of 30 fractions of 170 rad each, 5 times per week, for a total of 5100 rad. In both groups the external pelvis irradiation was followed by intracavitary brachytherapy in the uterus and vagina, with tandem-colpostat or tandem only, for a dose of 3000 rad at point A for the former, or at 2 cm from the center of the linear source for the latter. In cases where brachytherapy was not possible, a boost of external irradiation with reduced field, with a dose of 1600 rad (200 X 8) was advised. Three hundred and one patients were registered, of which 287 are currently evaluable. No differences between the treatments were detected for the following study end-points: treatment tolerance in terms of acute normal tissue reactions and completion of therapy, tumor control in the pelvis, severe late normal tissue reactions, and survival. In the entire study population the estimated tumor control in the pelvis at two years after initiation of therapy was: 81% for Stage II-B, 67% for III-A, 53% for Stage III-B, and 32% for Stage IV-A. The estimated two-year survival was: 70% for Stage II-B, 58% for III-A, 46% for III-B, and 23% for IV-A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources