Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1983 Nov 26;287(6405):1589-92.

Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial

Clinical Trial

Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial

M D Bastow et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

A total of 744 elderly women with fractured neck of femur were classified into three groups according to anthropometric measurements on admission: group 1, well nourished; group 2, thin; group 3, very thin. Group 1 ate well and had a low mortality and a short rehabilitation time. The thinner the patients the lower their voluntary food intake, the higher their mortality and the longer their rehabilitation time. A series of 122 patients from groups 2 and 3 were entered postoperatively into a randomised controlled trial of overnight supplementary nasogastric tube feeding (4.2 MJ (1000 kcal), including 28 g protein) in addition to their normal ward diet. This treatment was associated with improvements not only in anthropometric and plasma protein measurements but also in clinical outcome, especially in the very thin group 3 patients. Rehabilitation time and hospital stay were shortened. Mortality in group 3 was less in the tube fed patients (8%) than in the controls (22%) but this difference did not reach statistical significance. One in five patients could not tolerate the nasogastric tube, but in the remainder the treatment caused no side effects and did not seriously diminish voluntary oral food intake by day.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Postgrad Med J. 1976 Nov;52(613):678-82 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1962 Oct 6;2(7258):685-7 - PubMed
    1. J Surg Res. 1977 Jul;23(1):31-4 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1978 Jun 24;1(6128):1667-8 - PubMed
    1. Age Ageing. 1978 Nov;7(4):237-43 - PubMed

Publication types