Mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical efficacy and side effects of auranofin. An orally administered organic gold compound for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

The mechanism of action of auranofin, an oral organic gold compound used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is probably similar to the previously available parenteral gold compounds. Auranofin affects polymorphonuclear cells and monocytes at lower concentrations than gold sodium thiomalate and generally affects humoral and cell-mediated immunity in the same direction as the latter drug. The pharmacokinetics of auranofin are different from the intramuscular gold compounds. Auranofin is 20-25% orally absorbed and has less total body retention, greater fecal excretion, and less urinary excretion than gold sodium thiomalate. This may be due in part to its differing chemistry, including its lipophilicity and monomeric structure (at least in vitro). While many clinical studies are not yet complete, auranofin (6 mg/day) is clearly more effective than placebo for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Its efficacy relative to gold sodium thiomalate is not clear. Auranofin may be slightly less effective than gold sodium thiomalate, but because it is generally less toxic than intramuscular gold compounds, its therapeutic index may be more favorable.