Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Mar-Apr;99(2):173-83.

Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980

Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980

P J Placek et al. Public Health Rep. 1984 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

In the 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys, information about fetal monitoring and type of delivery was obtained from hospitals for a sample of 9,941 live births and 6,386 fetal deaths of 28 weeks' gestation or more. Data in this analysis are weighted to provide national estimates of live births and late fetal deaths that occurred in U.S. hospitals during 1980. Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was used for 47.7 percent of live births; 27.2 percent were monitored by Doppler ultrasound only, 10.2 percent by scalp electrode only, 6.3 percent by Doppler ultrasound and scalp electrode only, and 4.0 percent by other methods and combinations. The distribution by type of EFM used was similar for the 42.7 percent of late fetal deaths (also called stillbirths) that were monitored. Variation in the use of EFM for live births and stillbirths is examined according to maternal age, parity, education, race, marital status, income, previous fetal loss, underlying medical conditions, complications of pregnancy, complications of labor, duration of labor, infant birth weight, and length of gestation. Among live births, 17.1 percent were delivered by cesarean section, as were 16.8 percent of stillbirths. The association between fetal monitoring and the primary cesarean section rate (the probability of cesarean section for women who had never had one) for all birth orders and for first births is examined according to characteristics of the mothers and the infants. Factors involved in the consistent association found between fetal monitoring and the primary cesarean section rate are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Postgrad Med. 1977 Apr;61(4):160-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 1;131(5):526-32 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Aug;52(2):193-7 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul;54(1):103-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun 15;134(4):399-412 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources