Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980
- PMID: 6424166
- PMCID: PMC1424552
Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980
Abstract
In the 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys, information about fetal monitoring and type of delivery was obtained from hospitals for a sample of 9,941 live births and 6,386 fetal deaths of 28 weeks' gestation or more. Data in this analysis are weighted to provide national estimates of live births and late fetal deaths that occurred in U.S. hospitals during 1980. Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was used for 47.7 percent of live births; 27.2 percent were monitored by Doppler ultrasound only, 10.2 percent by scalp electrode only, 6.3 percent by Doppler ultrasound and scalp electrode only, and 4.0 percent by other methods and combinations. The distribution by type of EFM used was similar for the 42.7 percent of late fetal deaths (also called stillbirths) that were monitored. Variation in the use of EFM for live births and stillbirths is examined according to maternal age, parity, education, race, marital status, income, previous fetal loss, underlying medical conditions, complications of pregnancy, complications of labor, duration of labor, infant birth weight, and length of gestation. Among live births, 17.1 percent were delivered by cesarean section, as were 16.8 percent of stillbirths. The association between fetal monitoring and the primary cesarean section rate (the probability of cesarean section for women who had never had one) for all birth orders and for first births is examined according to characteristics of the mothers and the infants. Factors involved in the consistent association found between fetal monitoring and the primary cesarean section rate are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
-
Births and deaths: preliminary data for July 1997-June 1998.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999 Jul 29;47(22):1-32. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999. PMID: 10459278
-
Births: final data for 2001.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2002 Dec 18;51(2):1-102. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2002. PMID: 12596439
-
Births: final data for 2002.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003 Dec 17;52(10):1-113. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003. PMID: 14717305
-
Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007 May 2;55(14):1-32. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007. PMID: 17569269 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.Am J Public Health. 1988 Sep;78(9):1170-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1170. Am J Public Health. 1988. PMID: 3407813 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.955. Am J Public Health. 1987. PMID: 3605474 Free PMC article.
-
Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.Public Health Rep. 1988 Sep-Oct;103(5):459-63. Public Health Rep. 1988. PMID: 3140270 Free PMC article.
-
Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4437-4459. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12721. Epub 2018 Jan 19. Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29349772 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical