Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1984 Apr 28;288(6426):1277-80.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6426.1277.

Optimal timing of operation for bleeding peptic ulcer: prospective randomised trial

Clinical Trial

Optimal timing of operation for bleeding peptic ulcer: prospective randomised trial

D L Morris et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

From October 1980 to September 1983 all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were admitted to a centralised unit and investigated by early endoscopy. A total of 142 patients with a proved duodenal or gastric ulcer were randomised after stratification for age and site of ulcer to early (aggressive) surgical management or a delayed (conservative) policy. Significantly more operations (n = 42; 60%) were performed in the early than in the delayed (n = 9; 20%) groups (p less than 0.01). There were no deaths among the 42 patients under 60. The overall mortality in the 100 patients aged over 60 was 10% and when analysed on an "intention to treat" basis there was no difference between early and delayed surgery. When, however, an unrelated death from a bleeding colonic polyp was excluded and the data analysed on "treatment received" the mortality was only 2% in the early group compared with 13% in the delayed group (p less than 0.05). When analysis was confined to gastric ulcer the difference between early (0%) and delayed (24%) treatment was even greater. The results of this trial indicate that for patients over 60 an aggressive surgical policy is associated with a significant reduction in mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1977 Dec;134(6):721-3 - PubMed
    1. Q J Med. 1976 Oct;45(180):533-50 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1979 May 12;1(6173):1238-40 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1969 Feb 24;207(8):1477-80 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1955 Apr 23;1(4920):999-1002 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources