A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions
- PMID: 642487
- DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2101.05
A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions
Abstract
It has been found that listeners with sensorineural hearing loss who show similar patterns of consonant confusions also tend to have similar audiometric profiles. The present study determined whether normal listeners, presented with filtered speech, would produce consonant confusions similar to those previously reported for the hearing-impaired listener. Consonant confusion matrices were obtained from eight normal-hearing subjects for four sets of CV and VC nonsense syllables presented under six high-pass and six-low pass filtering conditions. Patterns of consonant confusion for each condition were described using phonological features in sequential information analysis. Severe low-pass filtering produced consonant confusions comparable to those of listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Severe high-pass filtering gave a result comparable to that of patients with flat or rising audiograms. And, mild filtering resulted in confusion patterns comparable to those of listeners with essentially normal hearing. An explanation in terms of the spectrum, the level of speech, and the configuration of this individual listener's audiogram is given.
Similar articles
-
Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Dec;19(4):718-48. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1904.718. J Speech Hear Res. 1976. PMID: 1003952
-
Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar;25(1):141-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2501.141. J Speech Hear Res. 1982. PMID: 7087417
-
Identification and discrimination of vowel-consonant syllables in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Dec;18(4):773-94. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1804.773. J Speech Hear Res. 1975. PMID: 1207107
-
Dimensions of consonant perception in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Sep;18(3):444-55. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1803.444. J Speech Hear Res. 1975. PMID: 1186154
-
CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY.Psychol Bull. 1963 Sep;60:429-40. doi: 10.1037/h0040116. Psychol Bull. 1963. PMID: 14051060 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):4032-43. doi: 10.1121/1.3641453. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 22225057 Free PMC article.
-
Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 2;10(3):e0114922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114922. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25730423 Free PMC article.
-
Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):607-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4807474. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 23862835 Free PMC article.
-
Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3177-88. doi: 10.1121/1.3377080. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010. PMID: 21117766 Free PMC article.
-
Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004638. Epub 2009 Mar 4. PLoS One. 2009. PMID: 19259259 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources