Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Mar;36(2):206-13.
doi: 10.1007/BF02405319.

24,25(OH)2D3, bone formation, and bone resorption in vitamin D-deficient, azotemic rats

24,25(OH)2D3, bone formation, and bone resorption in vitamin D-deficient, azotemic rats

W G Goodman et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984 Mar.

Abstract

Bone formation, mineralization, and resorption were measured in vitamin D-deficient, azotemic rats given two different dosages of 24,25(OH)2D3 daily and in vehicle-treated controls (C). The intraperitoneal administration of 65 pmol over a 10 day period corrected the hypocalcemia observed in C, whereas 130 pmol produced mild hypercalcemia. Both dosages reduced osteoid width, osteoid area, and mineralization front width from control values. The rates of bone and matrix formation were unaffected by treatment. In C, matrix formation exceeded bone formation and resulted in osteoid accumulation; both dosages of 24,25(OH)2D3 reversed this relationship such that bone formation exceeded matrix formation in each treatment group. The rates of osteoid maturation and initial mineralization increased during repletion with 24,25(OH)2D3 at both dosage levels. However, the serum calcium concentration was correlated with both osteoid maturation rate (r = 0.68, P less than 0.01) and initial mineralization rate (r = 0.63, P less than 0.01) when all three experimental groups were considered. Bone resorption was unchanged from control values during treatment with 24,25(OH)2D3. The results suggest that 24,25(OH)2D3 promotes the maturation and mineralization of osteoid, and that this metabolite differs in its effects on bone formation and resorption. It is not clear, however, that the changes in bone dynamics observed are independent of the calcemic response induced by metabolite repletion under the conditions of this experiment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Jul;182(1):251-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Pathol. 1978 Aug;92(2):459-72 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1980 May;238(5):E494-8 - PubMed
    1. Calcif Tissue Res. 1977 Oct 20;23(3):235-9 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1978 Nov 30;276(5687):517-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources