Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Oct;141(4):538-41.

A cost-benefit analysis of California's mandatory premarital screening program for syphilis

A cost-benefit analysis of California's mandatory premarital screening program for syphilis

R J Haskell. West J Med. 1984 Oct.

Abstract

As do most states, California requires premarital serologic tests for syphilis. The Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and a fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) are often used in series for this purpose. In 1979 in California, there were approximately 300,000 persons tested premaritally, but only 35 were found to have asymptomatic infectious syphilis (incidence=0.012%). Including all the direct costs of this screening program, the yearly costs of premarital screening is $8.5 million or almost $240,000 per case found. If one takes into account the sensitivities and specificities of the tests, one still has 6 false-negative and 90 false-positive tests using the 1979 figures. The benefits of the program are the number of cases of congenital syphilis that are prevented. Using a worse-case method, no more than 1.5% of the cases of syphilis detected would result in a case of congenital syphilis. The estimated benefits would result in a savings of approximately $161,000. The economic costs of the premarital screening program far outweigh the benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Dermatol. 1969 May;99(5):599-610 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1969 Sep;124(3):364-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1971 Mar 25;284(12):642-53 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Dec;83(6):846-50 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1978 Aug 4;240(5):459-60 - PubMed