A comparison of hyper- and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine for subarachnoid block
- PMID: 6476342
- DOI: 10.1177/0310057X8401200202
A comparison of hyper- and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine for subarachnoid block
Abstract
The comparative efficacy of two solutions of bupivacaine, 0.5% plain (isobaric-specific gravity 1.010), and 0.4% bupivacaine (hyperbaric-specific gravity 1.027) in 4% dextrose, for spinal anaesthesia was studied in 67 patients. Both solutions were clinically satisfactory (94% completely successful neural blockade). Hyperbaric bupivacaine blocks a greater number of spinal segments (p less than 0.01), causes a more rapid fall in blood pressure (p less than 0.05), and is more predictable in effect with regard to the number of segments blocked and to the lateralisation of the block. The duration of perioperative analgesia with the hyperbaric preparation is, however, shorter-3.8 hours as opposed to 5.8 hours (p less than 0.01)--but this was likely to be due to the smaller total dosage of bupivacaine used in the hyperbaric group. It is concluded that either solution may be used satisfactorily in clinical practice. The isobaric solution, however, despite its ready availability, is less satisfactory than the hyperbaric because its effect with regard to the extent of blockade is less predictable.
Similar articles
-
[Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Comparative study of 2 hyperbaric and isobaric solutions].Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1984;3(4):252-5. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(84)80115-x. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1984. PMID: 6476498 French.
-
Subarachnoid block with hyperbaric lignocaine. A comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine.Anaesthesia. 1987 Nov;42(11):1183-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05225.x. Anaesthesia. 1987. PMID: 3434739 Clinical Trial.
-
[Isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% solution for spinal anesthesia].Masui. 1989 May;38(5):666-73. Masui. 1989. PMID: 2778953 Japanese.
-
Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review.Anaesthesia. 2018 Apr;73(4):499-511. doi: 10.1111/anae.14084. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Anaesthesia. 2018. PMID: 29044483
-
[Failure of spinal anesthesia. Evaluation of the practice at a university hospital].Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1988;7(5):383-6. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(88)80054-6. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1988. PMID: 3061327 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Alteration of baricity: is it necessary?Can J Anaesth. 1992 Oct;39(8):753-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03008283. Can J Anaesth. 1992. PMID: 1288899 English, French. No abstract available.
-
Head Elevation in Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Provides Improved Hemodynamics and Appropriate Sensory Block Height at Caesarean Section.Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jul;56(4):1122-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1122. Yonsei Med J. 2015. PMID: 26069138 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intrathecal hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for adult non-caesarean-section surgery: systematic review protocol.BMJ Open. 2016 May 18;6(5):e010885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010885. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27194318 Free PMC article.
-
[Use of 2 % hyperbaric prilocaine for spinal anesthesia : sensitivity analysis in outpatient surgery].Anaesthesist. 2013 Apr;62(4):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2159-9. Epub 2013 Mar 29. Anaesthesist. 2013. PMID: 23535895 German.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources