Current trends in revision of total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 6490247
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00265830
Current trends in revision of total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty has brought pain relief and mobility to many patients, but load bearing implants may fail and the resulting problems must be tackled early and with vigour. The primary operation offers the best chance of success, and revision may only ever be considered a salvage procedure. Patients with total hip arthroplasty must be offered facilities for an indefinite follow-up. Revision surgery is not to be undertaken lightly or on an occasional basis, and the lessons learned from such procedures must be used for the benefit of the patients undergoing primary operation.
Similar articles
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Parkinson Disease: Improved Outcomes With Dual Mobility Implants and Cementless Fixation.J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1455-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.062. Epub 2017 Dec 5. J Arthroplasty. 2018. PMID: 29276118
-
Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective.Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):901-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26429197 Review.
-
Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients.Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):469-473. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3316-y. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Int Orthop. 2017. PMID: 27761631
-
Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):583-588. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3381-2. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Int Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28078362
-
The prevention and treatment of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: efforts to date and future strategies.Hip Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):388-92. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000273. Epub 2015 May 18. Hip Int. 2015. PMID: 26044529 Review.
Cited by
-
3D Printing Aids Acetabular Reconstruction in Complex Revision Hip Arthroplasty.Adv Orthop. 2017;2017:8925050. doi: 10.1155/2017/8925050. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Adv Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28168060 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for revision of failed hemiarthroplasty: Are there any differences between unipolar and bipolar?Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1117-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2176-0. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018. PMID: 29549451
-
Modulation of Cell Response through the Covalent Binding of Fibronectin to Titanium Substrates.J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jun 28;14(7):342. doi: 10.3390/jfb14070342. J Funct Biomater. 2023. PMID: 37504837 Free PMC article.
-
Onlay fibula autografting technique and its comparison with cortical allograft for the reconstruction of periprosthetic bone defects around the femur.Int Orthop. 2021 Jan;45(1):71-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04876-4. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Int Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33206205
-
Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.J Orthop. 2022 Sep 13;34:240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.004. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36120476 Free PMC article.